By Scalpel Team. , updated . 9 min read.

In short
A bull flag pattern is a sharp move up (the pole), then a short, tight pullback on lighter volume (the flag), then a break above the flag's high. Traders who use it buy the break, put the stop just under the flag's low, and aim for at least twice the risk. The evidence is modest: on daily charts Thomas Bulkowski found that 44% of flags failed to rise even 5% after an upward breakout, so treat a bull flag as a place to define risk, not a prediction.
The bull flag is the most common continuation pattern in small-cap momentum trading. A stock squeezes up on news, pauses for two or three candles, and either breaks out again or rolls over. This post covers what a valid bull flag looks like on a 1-minute chart, how to trade it with an entry, a stop and a target you can write down in advance, a fully worked example, and what the published evidence actually says about it.
We build a trading cockpit for Interactive Brokers that detects this pattern on its scanner, so we have looked at a lot of them. Our view: the flag itself is easy to spot. The hard part is the context around it, and that is where most of this post goes.
A bull flag has three parts, and each one has a job.
| Part | What you see | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| The pole | Three to six strong green candles, often on several times normal volume | Buyers are in control and willing to pay up |
| The flag | One to a few small candles drifting sideways or slightly down | Early buyers take some profit, but nobody is dumping |
| The break | A candle that trades above the flag's high, with volume picking up | Buyers are back, and the pullback is over |
Bulkowski, who has catalogued chart patterns for decades, describes flags as small rectangles "usually tilted against the prevailing price trend" and says that without a straight-line move up, "you don't have a flag" (Bulkowski on flags). He also notes that volume trended down during the flag in 74% of the cases with upward breakouts. That fits the intuition: a healthy pause is quiet.

Two rules of thumb separate a flag from a reversal:
Here is the plan most traders use, written as rules you can test in a simulator.
Entry. Buy when price trades above the high of the flag, usually the high of the last flag candle or a trendline drawn across the flag's highs. Use a marketable limit: the ask plus a few cents, so you get filled in a fast break without paying any price. Buying inside the flag, before the break, gets a better price but more failures; buying well above the break means chasing.
Stop. Just under the flag's low. If price comes back through the low of the pause, the pattern has failed by its own definition and there is no reason to stay. A cent or two under the low is less likely to be tagged by a single wick than the low itself.
Size. Size from the stop, not from a share count. Decide the dollars you will lose if the stop is hit, divide by the distance from entry to stop, and round down.
Target. Two common choices: the high of the pole (a retest), or a fixed multiple of your risk, such as 2R. Bulkowski's measure rule is a third: take the height of the pole, multiply it by the share of flags that met their target in his data (46%), and add the result to the flag's low.
WXYZ, a fictional $4 stock, prints a news headline at 08:12 ET. On the 1-minute chart:
Now the numbers:
| Item | Price | Arithmetic |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | 4.90 | Filled on the break of 4.88 |
| Stop | 4.77 | One cent under the flag low of 4.78 |
| Risk per share | 0.13 | 4.90 - 4.77 |
| Shares for $50 risk | 384 | 50 / 0.13 = 384.6, rounded down |
| 2R target | 5.16 | 4.90 + 2 x 0.13 |
| Measure rule target | 5.13 | 0.76 x 0.46 = 0.35, added to 4.78 |
| Pole high | 4.96 | First place sellers showed up |
Look at what sits between the entry and both targets: 5.00, a whole dollar. Sellers tend to stack offers at round numbers, so even a perfect flag can stall there. Many traders take part of the position just under 5.00 and hold the rest for a clean break. Our post on whole and half dollar levels covers why that level matters and what the research says about it.
Most bull flags that fail do so for a reason you could see before you bought. These are the ones we would check first.
Chart patterns describe what price did. They do not tell you what it will do next, and the published evidence on flags is thinner than their popularity suggests.
Bulkowski's daily chart statistics. His flags page reports, for bull markets, a break-even failure rate of 44% for upward breakouts, an average rise of 9%, and 46% of flags reaching the measure rule target (thepatternsite.com: flags, statistics updated on August 27, 2020). His glossary defines the break-even failure rate as the share of patterns that fail to rise at least 5% after the breakout, "the percentage of patterns that fail to cover the cost of trading" (glossary). These are daily charts with flags lasting days to under three weeks, not 1-minute flags in a small cap. They tell you a flag is roughly a coin flip with a modest edge on daily charts, not that it works intraday.
An intraday test on an index. Cervello-Royo, Guijarro and Michniuk (2015) built a trading rule around a formal flag definition, with fixed profit targets and stop losses, and tested it on 91,307 intraday observations of the Dow Jones index across 96 parameter settings (Expert Systems with Applications 42(14), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.03.017). They report positive results, larger on the German and British indexes than on the Dow. An index is not a $4 small cap with a 3-cent spread, and a rule tuned over 96 settings needs out-of-sample proof before anyone should trust it.
The broader caution. Marshall, Cahan and Cahan (2008) tested 7,846 popular technical trading rules on intraday US equity data and found that none were profitable once data snooping was accounted for (Journal of Empirical Finance 15(2)). Flags were not part of that study, but it is a fair warning about any pattern that looks good on a hand-picked chart.
Our reading: the bull flag gives you a clear invalidation point (the flag low) and a reason to expect buyers at the break. That makes it a useful way to structure a trade with defined risk. It is not evidence that the trade will work, and nothing here suggests it makes money on its own.
You can trade this pattern with Trader Workstation alone:
For step 2, IBKR's short lesson shows how to add, move and remove lines on a TWS chart, which is all you need to mark a flag's highs and lows.

IBKR's Traders' Academy has a short lesson on trend and continuation patterns, built from CME Group's study notes, that covers flags and pennants as a general concept. Keep a log of every flag you take: break time, volume, depth of the pullback, distance to the next whole dollar, and the result in R. After 50 trades you will know more about your version of the pattern than any statistic in this post.
Scalpel is a keyboard-first desktop cockpit for your own IBKR account. Its Setups scan watches every stock on the IBKR scanner's list on 1-minute candles and marks a live bull flag with a light green F chip and a "Bull flag" callout (scan types). It also detects the micro pullback, the flat top breakout and gap and go, which share the same logic of a pause and a break (momentum method).
A chip says the pattern is there, not that it will work: the detectors are deliberately simple, and a flag on a stock with no news means much less. When you take the trade, the Risk (Low) preset puts the stop just under the lowest low of the last 20 one-minute candles and sizes the order from that distance, which suits a pullback entry (sizing presets). The stop and target then show on the chart, where you can drag them under the flag low or up to the pole high (how stops work). Stops are app-monitored, not resting orders at IBKR, so they only work while Scalpel runs with a live feed.
This short video shows the chart, the read bar and the Level 2 reads that sit around a pattern like this:

For the full chart setup behind this post, see the best chart setup for day trading. Scalpel is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by Interactive Brokers or Thomas Bulkowski. Sources checked on October 22, 2026.
Trading carries a significant risk of loss. Nothing here is financial advice.